What are the chances of seeing a Sky-Blue Hairstreak in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sky-Blue Hairstreak sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 71st most-seen of the 114 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sky-Blue Hairstreak in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
February, May and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sky-Blue Hairstreak in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June–September and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sky-Blue Hairstreak?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sky-Blue Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Sky-Blue Hairstreak?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Sky-Blue Hairstreak sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and Ostional Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sky-Blue Hairstreak live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Sky-Blue Hairstreak that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Common Groundstreak (about 10%) and Red-Bordered Pixie (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sky-Blue Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sky-Blue Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.