What are the chances of seeing a Fire Salamander in Monfragüe National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Fire Salamander sighting in Monfragüe National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 10 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fire Salamander in Monfragüe National Park?
December
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Fire Salamander in Monfragüe National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fire Salamander?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fire Salamander sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Monfragüe National Park the best place to see a Fire Salamander?
8th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Fire Salamander sightings, Monfragüe National Park ranks 8th at about 30%. The best odds are in Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 80%), Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 60%) and Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Fire Salamander live in Monfragüe National Park?
Same family: Salamandridae
The closest relatives of the Fire Salamander that you can see in Monfragüe National Park (family Salamandridae, True Salamanders and Newts) are Bosca's newt (about 40%), Pygmy Marbled Newt (about 30%) and Spanish Newt (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fire Salamander sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fire Salamander is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Monfragüe National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.