What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Swan in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Swan sighting in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 104th most-seen of the 111 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Swan in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Swan in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Swan?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Swan sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nahuel Huapi National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Swan?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Black-necked Swan sightings, Nahuel Huapi National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Torres del Paine National Park (Chile, about 20%), Tierra del Fuego National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and Península Valdés (Argentina, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-necked Swan live in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Swan that you can see in Nahuel Huapi National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Ashy-headed Goose (about 40%), Yellow-billed Pintail (about 30%) and Flying Steamer-Duck (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Swan sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Swan is recorded against all the birds logged in Nahuel Huapi National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.