What are the chances of seeing a Giant Toad in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Giant Toad sighting in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Giant Toad in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
May
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Giant Toad in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March–April and October, the lowest months. January and February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Giant Toad?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Giant Toad sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park the best place to see a Giant Toad?
5th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Giant Toad sightings, Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park ranks 5th at about 40%. The best odds are in Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 50%), Cévennes National Park (France, about 50%) and Pyrénées National Park (France, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Giant Toad live in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
Same order: Anura
The closest relatives of the Giant Toad that you can see in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (order Anura, Frogs and Toads) are European Common Frog (about 40%) and Pyrenean frog (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Giant Toad sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Giant Toad is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.