Limenitis iphiclus
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cañón del Sumidero National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico | |
| 2 | Palo Verde National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Ostional Wildlife Refuge | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 5 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | Calakmul Biosphere Reserve | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Pedro Sula | 🇭🇳 Honduras | |
| 2 | San Salvador | 🇸🇻 El Salvador |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Limenitis iphiclus sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 30 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Limenitis iphiclus in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–June, September–October and December, the lowest months.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Limenitis iphiclus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Limenitis iphiclus sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 20%).
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Limenitis iphiclus that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are White Peacock (about 40%), Malachite (about 20%) and Soldier (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Limenitis iphiclus is recorded against all the insects logged in Palo Verde National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
