What are the chances of seeing a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk in Palo Verde National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 3rd most-seen of the 30 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk in Palo Verde National Park?
October
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June and August, the lowest months. That is one of Palo Verde National Park's wettest months, with about 480 mm of rain against almost none in February.
What time of day is best to see a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Flame-Tailed Pondhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Palo Verde National Park the best place to see a Flame-Tailed Pondhawk?
2nd of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Flame-Tailed Pondhawk sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Flame-Tailed Pondhawk live in Palo Verde National Park?
Same genus: Erythemis
The closest relatives of the Flame-Tailed Pondhawk that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (genus Erythemis, Pondhawks) are Great Pondhawk (about 50%), Pin-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%) and Black Pondhawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Flame-Tailed Pondhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Flame-Tailed Pondhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Palo Verde National Park (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.