What are the chances of seeing a Common Mapwing in Periyar National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Mapwing sighting in Periyar National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 31st most-seen of the 44 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Mapwing in Periyar National Park?
March
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Common Mapwing in Periyar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–July, September and December, the lowest months. That is one of Periyar National Park's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain against 410 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Common Mapwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Mapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Periyar National Park the best place to see a Common Mapwing?
6th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Common Mapwing sightings, Periyar National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 50%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%) and Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Mapwing live in Periyar National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Common Mapwing that you can see in Periyar National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Tamil Yeoman (about 40%), Glad-Eye Bushbrown (about 40%) and Chocolate Pansy (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Mapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Mapwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Periyar National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.