Scaphidomorphus bosci
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 2 | Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 3 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 4 | Piedras Blancas National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 5 | Yasuní National Park | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 6 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scaphidomorphus bosci sighting in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 117 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Scaphidomorphus bosci in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and September–February, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scaphidomorphus bosci sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
4th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Scaphidomorphus bosci sightings, Piedras Blancas National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 20%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 10%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Scaphidomorphus bosci that you can see in Piedras Blancas National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Harlequin Beetle (about 10%), Bearded Weevil (about 10%) and Elephant Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scaphidomorphus bosci is recorded against all the insects logged in Piedras Blancas National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
