What are the chances of seeing a Scaly Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Scaly Weaver sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 91 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 88th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scaly Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Scaly Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January–February, May and September–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scaly Weaver?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scaly Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Scaly Weaver?
4th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Scaly Weaver sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa, about 50%), Namib-Naukluft National Park (Namibia, about 30%) and Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Scaly Weaver live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same family: Ploceidae
The closest relatives of the Scaly Weaver that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (family Ploceidae, Weavers and Allies) are Southern Masked Weaver (about 50%), White-winged Widowbird (about 10%) and Red-billed Quelea (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scaly Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scaly Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (91 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.