What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Masked-Weaver sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 159th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park?
April–May, September and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June–August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Masked-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver?
30th of 42
Of the 42 parks where we can rate Lesser Masked-Weaver sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 30th at about 10%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 30%), Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Masked-Weaver live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Lesser Masked-Weaver that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Southern Masked Weaver (about 50%) and Village Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Masked-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Masked-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.