What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta in Podocarpus National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 88 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 163rd most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta in Podocarpus National Park?
March, June–July and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–May and August–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-crowned Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Chestnut-crowned Antpitta sightings, Podocarpus National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Chingaza National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-crowned Antpitta live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same genus: Grallaria
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-crowned Antpitta that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (genus Grallaria, Large Antpittas) are Chestnut-naped Antpitta (about 30%), Jocotoco Antpitta (about 20%) and Equatorial Antpitta (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-crowned Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-crowned Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (88 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.