What are the chances of seeing a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 391st most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Fulvous Shrike-Tanager?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sightings, Podocarpus National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 20%), Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Lacrimose Mountain-Tanager (about 40%), Masked Flowerpiercer (about 40%) and Blue-necked Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fulvous Shrike-Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.