What are the chances of seeing a Bonaparte's Gull in Redwood National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bonaparte's Gull sighting in Redwood National Park on a given day, based on 109 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 226 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bonaparte's Gull in Redwood National Park?
April–June and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bonaparte's Gull in Redwood National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bonaparte's Gull?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bonaparte's Gull sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Redwood National Park the best place to see a Bonaparte's Gull?
15th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Bonaparte's Gull sightings, Redwood National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 50%), Katmai National Park (United States, about 30%) and Great Bear Rainforest (Canada, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bonaparte's Gull live in Redwood National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Bonaparte's Gull that you can see in Redwood National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Western Gull (about 40%), California Gull (about 20%) and Glaucous-winged Gull (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bonaparte's Gull sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bonaparte's Gull is recorded against all the birds logged in Redwood National Park (109 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.