What are the chances of seeing an Indian Chat in Royal Bardia National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Chat sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 151st most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Indian Chat in Royal Bardia National Park?
January, April, July and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Chat in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–June and November–December, the lowest months. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Indian Chat?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Indian Chat sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see an Indian Chat?
5th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Indian Chat sightings, Royal Bardia National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Ranthambore National Park (India, about 20%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Indian Chat live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Indian Chat that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Pied Bushchat (about 50%), Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 40%) and Siberian Stonechat (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Indian Chat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Indian Chat is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Bardia National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.