Epidesmia tryxaria
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 5 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Neat Epidesmia sighting in Royal National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 112th most-seen of the 175 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January–March, September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Neat Epidesmia in Royal National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–August, October and December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Neat Epidesmia sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Neat Epidesmia sightings, Royal National Park ranks 5th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%), Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Neat Epidesmia that you can see in Royal National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Fallen Bark Looper (about 10%), Red-Lined Looper (about 10%) and Cyclophora obstataria (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Neat Epidesmia is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
