What are the chances of seeing a Gray-backed Tachuri in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-backed Tachuri sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 96 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 115th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gray-backed Tachuri in Serra da Canastra National Park?
May and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-backed Tachuri in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January–February, April and June–August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gray-backed Tachuri?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray-backed Tachuri sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Gray-backed Tachuri?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Gray-backed Tachuri sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Gray-backed Tachuri live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Gray-backed Tachuri that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), White-rumped Monjita (about 50%) and Crested Black-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gray-backed Tachuri sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray-backed Tachuri is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (96 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.