What are the chances of seeing a Common Woolly Monkey in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common Woolly Monkey sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 36 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 6 mammals we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Woolly Monkey in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
December
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Common Woolly Monkey in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against about 20% in June, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Common Woolly Monkey?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Woolly Monkey sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Common Woolly Monkey?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Common Woolly Monkey sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 3rd at about 40%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 60%) and Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Woolly Monkey live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Atelidae
The closest relatives of the Common Woolly Monkey that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Atelidae, Spider, Howler, and Woolly Monkeys) are Colombian Red Howler Monkey (about 50%) and Long-haired Spider Monkey (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Woolly Monkey sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Woolly Monkey is recorded against all the mammals logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (36 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.