What are the chances of seeing a Marsh Fritillary in Sierra Nevada National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Marsh Fritillary sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 42 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 54th most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Marsh Fritillary in Sierra Nevada National Park?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Marsh Fritillary in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Marsh Fritillary?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Marsh Fritillary sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra Nevada National Park the best place to see a Marsh Fritillary?
Among the best
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Marsh Fritillary sightings, Sierra Nevada National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Marsh Fritillary live in Sierra Nevada National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Marsh Fritillary that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Wall Brown (about 40%), Iberian Marbled White (about 30%) and Painted Lady (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Marsh Fritillary sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Marsh Fritillary is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (42 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.