What are the chances of seeing a Carmiol's Tanager in Soberanía National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Carmiol's Tanager sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 420th most-seen of the 449 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Carmiol's Tanager in Soberanía National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Carmiol's Tanager in Soberanía National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Carmiol's Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Carmiol's Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Carmiol's Tanager?
10th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Carmiol's Tanager sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 40%), Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%) and Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Carmiol's Tanager live in Soberanía National Park?
Same family: Cardinalidae
The closest relatives of the Carmiol's Tanager that you can see in Soberanía National Park (family Cardinalidae, Cardinals and Allies) are Summer Tanager (about 30%), Blue-black Grosbeak (about 10%) and Scarlet Tanager (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Carmiol's Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Carmiol's Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Soberanía National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.