What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut Woodpecker in Tambopata National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Woodpecker sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 116 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 302nd most-seen of the 550 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut Woodpecker in Tambopata National Reserve?
January–February, May and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Woodpecker in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June–August and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see a Chestnut Woodpecker?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Chestnut Woodpecker sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 20%), Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut Woodpecker live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same genus: Celeus
The closest relatives of the Chestnut Woodpecker that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (genus Celeus, Neotropical Crested Woodpeckers) are Cream-colored Woodpecker (about 10%) and Ringed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Tambopata National Reserve (116 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.