Cnemidophyllum lineatum
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Cnemidophyllum lineatum is a species of insect from the genus Cnemidophyllum. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 2 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 3 | Yasuní National Park | 🇪🇨 Ecuador |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cnemidophyllum lineatum sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 86th most-seen of the 141 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cnemidophyllum lineatum in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months. That is one of Tambopata National Reserve's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 420 mm in February.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cnemidophyllum lineatum sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Cnemidophyllum lineatum sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Cnemidophyllum lineatum that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Roxelana crassicornis (about 10%), Pterochroza ocellata (about 10%) and Copiphora gracilis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cnemidophyllum lineatum is recorded against all the insects logged in Tambopata National Reserve (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
