What are the chances of seeing a Copiphora gracilis in Tambopata National Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Copiphora gracilis sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 50th most-seen of the 141 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Copiphora gracilis in Tambopata National Reserve?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Copiphora gracilis in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–May, July and October, the lowest months. That is one of Tambopata National Reserve's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 420 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Copiphora gracilis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Copiphora gracilis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see a Copiphora gracilis?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Copiphora gracilis sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Copiphora gracilis live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Copiphora gracilis that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Roxelana crassicornis (about 10%), Pterochroza ocellata (about 10%) and Euceraia sanguinea (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Copiphora gracilis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Copiphora gracilis is recorded against all the insects logged in Tambopata National Reserve (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.