What are the chances of seeing a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Tatra National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting in Tatra National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 88 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Tatra National Park?
March and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Tatra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–June and August–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tatra National Park the best place to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
8th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings, Tatra National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 40%), Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 20%) and Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker live in Tatra National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker that you can see in Tatra National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Great Spotted Woodpecker (about 40%), Black Woodpecker (about 20%) and Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Middle Spotted Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Tatra National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.