What are the chances of seeing a Pearl-breasted Swallow in West Coast National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pearl-breasted Swallow sighting in West Coast National Park on a given day, based on 371 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 70th most-seen of the 192 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pearl-breasted Swallow in West Coast National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pearl-breasted Swallow in West Coast National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April to July, the lowest months. That is one of West Coast National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 70 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Pearl-breasted Swallow?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pearl-breasted Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is West Coast National Park the best place to see a Pearl-breasted Swallow?
Among the best
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Pearl-breasted Swallow sightings, West Coast National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in De Hoop Nature Reserve (South Africa, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Pearl-breasted Swallow live in West Coast National Park?
Same genus: Hirundo
The closest relatives of the Pearl-breasted Swallow that you can see in West Coast National Park (genus Hirundo, Typical Swallows) are White-throated Swallow (about 60%) and Barn Swallow (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pearl-breasted Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pearl-breasted Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in West Coast National Park (371 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.