What are the chances of seeing a Dark Blue Tiger in Yala National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Blue Tiger sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the most-seen of the 12 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dark Blue Tiger in Yala National Park?
October to February
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Blue Tiger in Yala National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to September, the lowest months. Those are among Yala National Park's wettest months, with about 190 mm of rain a month against 35 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Dark Blue Tiger?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dark Blue Tiger sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Dark Blue Tiger?
5th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Dark Blue Tiger sightings, Yala National Park ranks 5th at about 30%. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%), Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Dark Blue Tiger live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Dark Blue Tiger that you can see in Yala National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Common Crow (about 30%) and Plain Tiger Butterfly (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dark Blue Tiger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dark Blue Tiger is recorded against all the insects logged in Yala National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.