What are the chances of seeing a Fire Salamander in Aigüestortes National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Fire Salamander sighting in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 7 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fire Salamander in Aigüestortes National Park?
May and November
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Fire Salamander in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Fire Salamander?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fire Salamander sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Aigüestortes National Park the best place to see a Fire Salamander?
6th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Fire Salamander sightings, Aigüestortes National Park ranks 6th at about 40%. The best odds are in Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 80%), Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 60%) and Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Fire Salamander live in Aigüestortes National Park?
Same family: Salamandridae
The closest relatives of the Fire Salamander that you can see in Aigüestortes National Park (family Salamandridae, True Salamanders and Newts) are Pyrenean Brook Salamander (about 40%) and Palmate Newt (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fire Salamander sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fire Salamander is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Aigüestortes National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.