What are the chances of seeing a Ruby Tiger Moth in Aigüestortes National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruby Tiger Moth sighting in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 218th most-seen of the 256 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruby Tiger Moth in Aigüestortes National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruby Tiger Moth in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruby Tiger Moth?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruby Tiger Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Aigüestortes National Park the best place to see a Ruby Tiger Moth?
8th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Ruby Tiger Moth sightings, Aigüestortes National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 20%), Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 10%) and Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Ruby Tiger Moth live in Aigüestortes National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Ruby Tiger Moth that you can see in Aigüestortes National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Jersey Tiger (about 40%), Scarlet Tiger (about 20%) and Four-Spotted Footman (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruby Tiger Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruby Tiger Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Aigüestortes National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.