What are the chances of seeing a Lawrence's Thrush in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lawrence's Thrush sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 338th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lawrence's Thrush in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lawrence's Thrush in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lawrence's Thrush?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lawrence's Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Lawrence's Thrush?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Lawrence's Thrush sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Lawrence's Thrush live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same genus: Turdus
The closest relatives of the Lawrence's Thrush that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (genus Turdus, Typical Thrushes) are Black-billed Thrush (about 20%) and Várzea Thrush (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lawrence's Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lawrence's Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.