What are the chances of seeing a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Amboró National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Flowerpiercer sighting in Amboró National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 175th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Amboró National Park?
July
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Amboró National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. That is one of Amboró National Park's driest months, with about 120 mm of rain against 340 mm in January. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rusty Flowerpiercer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboró National Park the best place to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Rusty Flowerpiercer sightings, Amboró National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rusty Flowerpiercer live in Amboró National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Rusty Flowerpiercer that you can see in Amboró National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Black-goggled Tanager (about 40%), Sayaca Tanager (about 40%) and Palm Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rusty Flowerpiercer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rusty Flowerpiercer is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboró National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.