What are the chances of seeing a Black-goggled Tanager in Amboró National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-goggled Tanager sighting in Amboró National Park on a given day, based on 213 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 26th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-goggled Tanager in Amboró National Park?
April and September
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Black-goggled Tanager in Amboró National Park on a given day, against about 20% in August and November, the lowest months. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-goggled Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-goggled Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboró National Park the best place to see a Black-goggled Tanager?
Yes
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Black-goggled Tanager sightings, Amboró National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-goggled Tanager live in Amboró National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Black-goggled Tanager that you can see in Amboró National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Sayaca Tanager (about 40%), Palm Tanager (about 30%) and Guira Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-goggled Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-goggled Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboró National Park (213 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.