What are the chances of seeing a Baillon's Crake in Amboseli National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baillon's Crake sighting in Amboseli National Park on a given day, based on 42 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 207th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baillon's Crake in Amboseli National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Baillon's Crake in Amboseli National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to March, the lowest months. That is one of Amboseli National Park's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain against 10 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Baillon's Crake?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baillon's Crake sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboseli National Park the best place to see a Baillon's Crake?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Baillon's Crake sightings, Amboseli National Park has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Fiordland National Park (New Zealand, under 5%) and Grampians National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Baillon's Crake live in Amboseli National Park?
Same family: Rallidae
The closest relatives of the Baillon's Crake that you can see in Amboseli National Park (family Rallidae, Rails, Gallinules, and Coots) are Red-knobbed Coot (about 30%), Black Crake (about 20%) and Common Moorhen (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baillon's Crake sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baillon's Crake is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboseli National Park (42 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.