What are the chances of seeing a Blacksmith Lapwing in Amboseli National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Blacksmith Lapwing sighting in Amboseli National Park on a given day, based on 1,079 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blacksmith Lapwing in Amboseli National Park?
January, March–April and June–July
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Blacksmith Lapwing in Amboseli National Park on a given day, against about 70% in February, May and August–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blacksmith Lapwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blacksmith Lapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboseli National Park the best place to see a Blacksmith Lapwing?
4th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Blacksmith Lapwing sightings, Amboseli National Park ranks 4th at about 70%. The best odds are in Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 80%), Moremi Game Reserve (Botswana, about 80%) and Chobe National Park (Botswana, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blacksmith Lapwing live in Amboseli National Park?
Same genus: Vanellus
The closest relatives of the Blacksmith Lapwing that you can see in Amboseli National Park (genus Vanellus, Lapwings) are Crowned Lapwing (about 60%), Long-toed Lapwing (about 60%) and Spur-winged Lapwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blacksmith Lapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blacksmith Lapwing is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboseli National Park (1,079 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.