What are the chances of seeing a Bare-necked Fruitcrow in Anavilhanas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bare-necked Fruitcrow sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 46 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 105th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bare-necked Fruitcrow in Anavilhanas National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Bare-necked Fruitcrow in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bare-necked Fruitcrow?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bare-necked Fruitcrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Bare-necked Fruitcrow?
4th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Bare-necked Fruitcrow sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Bare-necked Fruitcrow live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Cotingidae
The closest relatives of the Bare-necked Fruitcrow that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Cotingidae, Cotingas) are Screaming Piha (about 20%), Várzea Schiffornis (about 20%) and Amazonian Umbrellabird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bare-necked Fruitcrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bare-necked Fruitcrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (46 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.