What are the chances of seeing a Várzea Schiffornis in Anavilhanas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Várzea Schiffornis sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 61 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 79th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Várzea Schiffornis in Anavilhanas National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Várzea Schiffornis in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in July, October and December–April, the lowest months. That is one of Anavilhanas National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 340 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Várzea Schiffornis?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Várzea Schiffornis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Várzea Schiffornis?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Várzea Schiffornis sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Várzea Schiffornis live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Cotingidae
The closest relatives of the Várzea Schiffornis that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Cotingidae, Cotingas) are Screaming Piha (about 20%), Bare-necked Fruitcrow (about 10%) and Amazonian Umbrellabird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Várzea Schiffornis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Várzea Schiffornis is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (61 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.