What are the chances of seeing a Pale Tussock Moth in Białowieża National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Tussock Moth sighting in Białowieża National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 158 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale Tussock Moth in Białowieża National Park?
September
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Tussock Moth in Białowieża National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August and October–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pale Tussock Moth?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale Tussock Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Białowieża National Park the best place to see a Pale Tussock Moth?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Pale Tussock Moth sightings, Białowieża National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Snowdonia National Park (United Kingdom, about 30%), Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Pale Tussock Moth live in Białowieża National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Pale Tussock Moth that you can see in Białowieża National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Scarlet Tiger (about 20%), White Ermine (about 20%) and Garden Tiger (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale Tussock Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale Tussock Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Białowieża National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.