What are the chances of seeing a Ruby Tiger Moth in Biebrza National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruby Tiger Moth sighting in Biebrza National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 60th most-seen of the 97 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruby Tiger Moth in Biebrza National Park?
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Ruby Tiger Moth in Biebrza National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–June, August and October, the lowest months. That is one of Biebrza National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 35 mm in March. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Ruby Tiger Moth?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruby Tiger Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Biebrza National Park the best place to see a Ruby Tiger Moth?
Yes
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Ruby Tiger Moth sightings, Biebrza National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 10%) and Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Ruby Tiger Moth live in Biebrza National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Ruby Tiger Moth that you can see in Biebrza National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Spongy Moth (about 40%), White Ermine (about 20%) and Pale Tussock Moth (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruby Tiger Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruby Tiger Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Biebrza National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.