What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Woodpecker sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 49 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 90th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–March, August, October and December, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Chestnut Woodpecker?
Yes
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Chestnut Woodpecker sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut Woodpecker live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same genus: Celeus
The closest relatives of the Chestnut Woodpecker that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (genus Celeus, Neotropical Crested Woodpeckers) are Waved Woodpecker (about 30%) and Ringed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (49 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.