What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Woodpecker sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 94 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 51st most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
March
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against about 20% in September and November–December, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Woodpecker?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Red-necked Woodpecker?
Among the best
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Red-necked Woodpecker sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Red-necked Woodpecker live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Woodpecker that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-olive Woodpecker (about 50%), Waved Woodpecker (about 30%) and Golden-collared Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (94 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.