What are the chances of seeing a Ringed Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ringed Woodpecker sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 152nd most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ringed Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ringed Woodpecker in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, August and October–December, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Ringed Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ringed Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Ringed Woodpecker?
Among the best
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Ringed Woodpecker sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Ringed Woodpecker live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same genus: Celeus
The closest relatives of the Ringed Woodpecker that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (genus Celeus, Neotropical Crested Woodpeckers) are Waved Woodpecker (about 30%) and Chestnut Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ringed Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ringed Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.