What are the chances of seeing a Pectoral Sparrow in Brownsberg Nature Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pectoral Sparrow sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 146th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pectoral Sparrow in Brownsberg Nature Park?
January–March and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pectoral Sparrow in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, August–October and December, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pectoral Sparrow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pectoral Sparrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Pectoral Sparrow?
Among the best
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Pectoral Sparrow sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pectoral Sparrow live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Pectoral Sparrow that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Purple Honeycreeper (about 70%), Red-legged Honeycreeper (about 70%) and Guianan Warbling-Antbird (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pectoral Sparrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pectoral Sparrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.