What are the chances of seeing a Nutting's Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Nutting's Flycatcher sighting in Carara National Park on a given day, based on 145 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 279th most-seen of the 414 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Nutting's Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Nutting's Flycatcher in Carara National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Nutting's Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nutting's Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Carara National Park the best place to see a Nutting's Flycatcher?
9th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Nutting's Flycatcher sightings, Carara National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 10%) and Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Nutting's Flycatcher live in Carara National Park?
Same genus: Myiarchus
The closest relatives of the Nutting's Flycatcher that you can see in Carara National Park (genus Myiarchus, Myiarchus Flycatchers) are Dusky-capped Flycatcher (about 20%), Great Crested Flycatcher (about 10%) and Panama Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Nutting's Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nutting's Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Carara National Park (145 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.