What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Cévennes National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Damselfly sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 730th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Cévennes National Park?
April, June and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Damselfly in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July and September–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Tailed Damselfly sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Blue-Tailed Damselfly?
11th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Blue-Tailed Damselfly sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 40%), Hortobágy National Park (Hungary, about 40%) and Camargue (France, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-Tailed Damselfly live in Cévennes National Park?
Same family: Coenagrionidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Tailed Damselfly that you can see in Cévennes National Park (family Coenagrionidae, Narrow-winged Damselflies) are Large Red Damselfly (about 20%), Azure Damselfly (about 10%) and Common Blue Damselfly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Tailed Damselfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Tailed Damselfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.