Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae is an Australian bud-galling wasp from the family Melanosomellidae that parasitises, among others, Acacia longifolia (long-leaved wattle, or Sydney golden wattle), which has become an invasive pest in several countries. T. acaciaelongifoliae has been introduced into South Africa in 1985 and into Portugal in 2015 as a successful biological control agent of A. longifolia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grampians National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Freycinet National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Table Mountain National Park | 🇿🇦 South Africa | |
| 4 | Garden Route National Park | 🇿🇦 South Africa | |
| 5 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 6 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Longleaf Wattle Gall Wasp sighting in Melbourne on a given day, based on 59 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 214th most-seen of the 875 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September to December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Longleaf Wattle Gall Wasp in Melbourne on a given day, against under 5% in January to August, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Longleaf Wattle Gall Wasp sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
3rd of 6
Of the 6 cities where we can rate Longleaf Wattle Gall Wasp sightings, Melbourne ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Hobart (Australia, about 10%) and Porto (Portugal, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Longleaf Wattle Gall Wasp is recorded against all the insects logged in Melbourne (59 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
