What are the chances of seeing an Amur Stonechat in Cuc Phuong National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Amur Stonechat sighting in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 71st most-seen of the 159 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amur Stonechat in Cuc Phuong National Park?
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Amur Stonechat in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May, August and December, the lowest months. July has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Amur Stonechat?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amur Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Cuc Phuong National Park the best place to see an Amur Stonechat?
3rd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Amur Stonechat sightings, Cuc Phuong National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 30%) and Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Amur Stonechat live in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Amur Stonechat that you can see in Cuc Phuong National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-rumped Shama (about 40%), Rufous-tailed Robin (about 40%) and Fujian Niltava (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amur Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amur Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuc Phuong National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.