What are the chances of seeing a Bonaparte's Gull in Everglades National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bonaparte's Gull sighting in Everglades National Park on a given day, based on 146 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 174th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bonaparte's Gull in Everglades National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bonaparte's Gull in Everglades National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Bonaparte's Gull?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bonaparte's Gull sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Everglades National Park the best place to see a Bonaparte's Gull?
22nd of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Bonaparte's Gull sightings, Everglades National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 50%), Katmai National Park (United States, about 30%) and Great Bear Rainforest (Canada, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bonaparte's Gull live in Everglades National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Bonaparte's Gull that you can see in Everglades National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Laughing Gull (about 30%), Royal Tern (about 20%) and Caspian Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bonaparte's Gull sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bonaparte's Gull is recorded against all the birds logged in Everglades National Park (146 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.