What are the chances of seeing a Latticed Heath in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Latticed Heath sighting in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 96th most-seen of the 243 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Latticed Heath in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Latticed Heath in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to March, the lowest months. That is one of Fertő-Hanság National Park's wettest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 30 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Latticed Heath?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Latticed Heath sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Fertő-Hanság National Park the best place to see a Latticed Heath?
16th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Latticed Heath sightings, Fertő-Hanság National Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 30%), Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Latticed Heath live in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Latticed Heath that you can see in Fertő-Hanság National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Common Heath (about 10%), Yellow Shell Moth (about 10%) and Common Carpet Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Latticed Heath sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Latticed Heath is recorded against all the insects logged in Fertő-Hanság National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.