What are the chances of seeing a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Gauja National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting in Gauja National Park on a given day, based on 52 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 57th most-seen of the 124 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Gauja National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Gauja National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June–July, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gauja National Park the best place to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
6th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings, Gauja National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 40%), Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 20%) and Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker live in Gauja National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker that you can see in Gauja National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Great Spotted Woodpecker (about 30%), Black Woodpecker (about 10%) and Grey-headed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Middle Spotted Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Gauja National Park (52 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.