What are the chances of seeing a Black Woodpecker in Gauja National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Woodpecker sighting in Gauja National Park on a given day, based on 41 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 67th most-seen of the 124 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Woodpecker in Gauja National Park?
April–July, September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Woodpecker in Gauja National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August, October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gauja National Park the best place to see a Black Woodpecker?
16th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black Woodpecker sightings, Gauja National Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 50%), Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 20%) and Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Woodpecker live in Gauja National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Black Woodpecker that you can see in Gauja National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Great Spotted Woodpecker (about 30%), Middle Spotted Woodpecker (about 10%) and Grey-headed Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Gauja National Park (41 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.