What are the chances of seeing a Punctate Flower Chafer in Grampians National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Punctate Flower Chafer sighting in Grampians National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 148 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Punctate Flower Chafer in Grampians National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Punctate Flower Chafer in Grampians National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to December, the lowest months. That is one of Grampians National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 85 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Punctate Flower Chafer?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Punctate Flower Chafer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grampians National Park the best place to see a Punctate Flower Chafer?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Punctate Flower Chafer sightings, Grampians National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Wilsons Promontory National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Royal National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Punctate Flower Chafer live in Grampians National Park?
Same family: Scarabaeidae
The closest relatives of the Punctate Flower Chafer that you can see in Grampians National Park (family Scarabaeidae, Scarabs) are Cheiroplatys bifossus (about 10%) and Duck Billed Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Punctate Flower Chafer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Punctate Flower Chafer is recorded against all the insects logged in Grampians National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.