What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-thighed Kite in Iguazú National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-thighed Kite sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 77 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 343 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-thighed Kite in Iguazú National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-thighed Kite in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to September, the lowest months. That is one of Iguazú National Park's wettest months, with about 240 mm of rain against 90 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-thighed Kite?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-thighed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguazú National Park the best place to see a Rufous-thighed Kite?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Rufous-thighed Kite sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%), Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, under 5%) and Tijuca National Park (Brazil, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-thighed Kite live in Iguazú National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-thighed Kite that you can see in Iguazú National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 30%), Plumbeous Kite (about 20%) and Snail Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-thighed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-thighed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Iguazú National Park (77 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.